Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Infinity (view source)

Revision as of 16:24, July 30, 2018

327 bytes added ,  16:24, July 30, 2018
→‎Bernhard Riemann: Not sure if there is a meaningful distinction here. Infinitely small is inherently a limit. But you make a very interesting point and I'll think about it further. Also, did Euler, Leibniz or Newton use the concept of infinitesima
Line 57: Line 57:     
That may sound like hair-splitting, but his approach could be rigorously formalized quite easily, while this was much more difficult for infinitesimals.--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 10:36, 30 July 2018 (EDT)
 
That may sound like hair-splitting, but his approach could be rigorously formalized quite easily, while this was much more difficult for infinitesimals.--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 10:36, 30 July 2018 (EDT)
 +
:Not sure if there is a meaningful distinction here.  Infinitely small is inherently a limit.  But you make a very interesting point and I'll think about it further.  Also, did Euler, Leibniz or Newton use the concept of infinitesimal?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 12:24, 30 July 2018 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1436479"

Navigation menu