Changes

*The Nunes Paradox.<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/29/understanding-the-nunes-paradox/</ref>

*The Nunes Paradox.<ref>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/29/understanding-the-nunes-paradox/</ref>

*'''30 March.'''  

*'''30 March.''' Sen. Grassley asks of the [[State Department]] the status of  security clearances for Hillary Clinton and 6 of her "research assistance" involved in mishandling classified materials, and any steps the department is taking to review whether the clearances should be suspended or revoked. “Any other government workers who engaged in such serious offenses would, at a minimum, have their clearances suspended pending an investigation.  The failure to do so has given the public the impression that Secretary Clinton and her associates received special treatment,” Grassley wrote. Following FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s email server, Dir. Comey noted that “there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” and that individuals who are careless with such material are “often subject to security or administrative sanctions.” The Obama State Dept. previously told Grassley’s office that it would wait until after the FBI concluded its investigation before determining whether those involved should face consequences for mishandling sensitive material. While the investigation has been over for months, it remains unclear whether any such review has taken place. Sen. Grassley sent two letters inquiring about such a review (August 24, 2015, May 19, 2016) to [[John Kerry]] and both were ignored.<ref>https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-seeks-update-clearance-review-clinton-email-case</ref> The question remains unanswered - whether Hillary Clinton and her 6 staffers still hold security clearances more than 4 years later - longer than the amount of time she served in office.<ref>https://mobile.twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/847777257384890368/video/1™a</ref>

 

*Sen. Grassley asks of the [[State Department]] the status of  security clearances for Hillary Clinton and 6 of her "research assistance" involved in mishandling classified materials, and any steps the department is taking to review whether the clearances should be suspended or revoked. “Any other government workers who engaged in such serious offenses would, at a minimum, have their clearances suspended pending an investigation.  The failure to do so has given the public the impression that Secretary Clinton and her associates received special treatment,” Grassley wrote. Following FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s email server, Dir. Comey noted that “there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,” and that individuals who are careless with such material are “often subject to security or administrative sanctions.” The Obama State Dept. previously told Grassley’s office that it would wait until after the FBI concluded its investigation before determining whether those involved should face consequences for mishandling sensitive material. While the investigation has been over for months, it remains unclear whether any such review has taken place. Sen. Grassley sent two letters inquiring about such a review (August 24, 2015, May 19, 2016) to [[John Kerry]] and both were ignored.<ref>https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-seeks-update-clearance-review-clinton-email-case</ref> The question remains unanswered - whether Hillary Clinton and her 6 staffers still hold security clearances more than 4 years later - longer than the amount of time she served in office.<ref>https://mobile.twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/847777257384890368/video/1™a</ref>

*Farkas questioned on [[CNBC]]: "you actually said that “I knew that there was more. I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open, and I knew that there was more.” And then, you actually said that that’s why you have all the leaking, to make sure we get it out.  I mean, people are accusing you, Evelyn, of admitting that was surveillance, admitting that there was unmasking, and urging people, or, at least, saying that intelligence leaking, which could be a felony, is the way that it should get out. And you weren’t even part of the government at that point."<ref>http://www.mrctv.org/videos/former-obama-official-stumbles-while-trying-backtrack-after-implying-intel-leaks</ref>  

*Farkas questioned on [[CNBC]]: "you actually said that “I knew that there was more. I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open, and I knew that there was more.” And then, you actually said that that’s why you have all the leaking, to make sure we get it out.  I mean, people are accusing you, Evelyn, of admitting that was surveillance, admitting that there was unmasking, and urging people, or, at least, saying that intelligence leaking, which could be a felony, is the way that it should get out. And you weren’t even part of the government at that point."<ref>http://www.mrctv.org/videos/former-obama-official-stumbles-while-trying-backtrack-after-implying-intel-leaks</ref>