| Line 281: |
Line 281: |
| | *[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/E_%3D_mc%C2%B2 Lecture 4 from Wikiversity] | | *[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/E_%3D_mc%C2%B2 Lecture 4 from Wikiversity] |
| | *[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/spacetime_diagrams_and_vectors Lecture 5 from Wikiversity] | | *[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/spacetime_diagrams_and_vectors Lecture 5 from Wikiversity] |
| | + | |
| | + | ==How '''NOT''' to proselytize== |
| | + | [[User:Conservative]] ("Cons") has the laudable goal of introducing people to Christianity on the pages of this wiki. However, I don't think the incredibly obsessive way he does this is likely to be effective. |
| | + | *He seems obsessed with svelte Indian Christian ladies and their graceful dancing style, as though that should persuade people to embrace Christianity. (Many references in [[Essay:_Indian_Christian_culture_is_better_than_low_class_atheist_%22culture%22|this article]].) |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. Those Indian Christian ladies are so graceful, that must show that Jesus is the son of God. I'd better join a church right away." |
| | + | *He also seems obsessed with Penn Jillette's lack of grace when dancing the "Walrus Slide", and with the fact that Ken Ham likes to yodel. (See [[Essay:_Penn_Jillette%27s_walrus_slide_vs._thin_Indian_Christian_lady_dancers|this article, which is remarkably similar to the one cited just above]].) |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. Ken Ham likes to yodel when climbing the Triceratops model at the Creation Museum, and when climbing mountains. I guess that shows that the universe was created in 6 days, 6000 years ago." |
| | + | *He also points out that the Swiss like to yodel, [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB#re:_well-intentioned_and_level-headed_people here]. |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. The Swiss like to yodel. Jesus is lord!" |
| | + | *He also likes to point out, in too many places to list here, that non-Western cultures are expanding at the expense of traditional American cultures. He says this with a degree of glee that makes me wonder whose side he is on. |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. Non-Western societies are rapidly growing due to their high birth rate. I guess I'd better convert to Islam." |
| | + | *He points out the atheists aren't as good-looking as religious people [[Atheists and physical attractiveness|here]], as though there is something meaningful that we are supposed to take away from this notion. |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. Women don't seem to want to date me. I guess I'm ugly. I'd better join a Bible study group at my college. That will make me better-looking, and I'll get lots of dates." |
| | + | *And then there's [[Essay:_Militant_atheism_and_short_man's_syndrome|this]] gem. |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. I'm kind of short. Most women I know are taller than I am, and seem not to want to date men shorter than they are. Maybe if I go to church regularly I'll grow taller. There ''is'' a causal relationship, isn't there? It's right in the essay: "Get over it little man, shortness is a causal factor for militant atheism!" |
| | + | *He has also been pointing out for several years and "20XX is going to be (or already is) the worst year ever for atheism. He even made a past-tense claim about a year that is still happening [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/166#2018_was_a_TERRIBLE_year_for_militant_atheists here]. |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. After all this, are atheists still around? How come I still see so many of them? Does the existence of God not depend on something someone once said in an elevator?" |
| | + | *He had recently been obsessed with potholes in British streets, even putting an article on the main page for a while. He apparently wants to use the state of British roads to make some quasi-political, quasi-religious, quasi-scientific argument. |
| | + | ::"Well, gosh. There are potholes in streets in the UK, and Charles Darwin (more than 100 years ago) was British. I guess that means that evolution did not occur. I'm glad people can see these scientific principles so clearly." |
| | + | Most of his "articles" contain enormous numbers of references to other of his articles, as though that counts as a "reference". |
| | | | |
| | ==I would really love to see [[User:Conservative]] slowly and painfully burn== | | ==I would really love to see [[User:Conservative]] slowly and painfully burn== |