Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
3,649 bytes added ,  01:07, September 3, 2018
How '''NOT''' to proselytize
Line 281: Line 281:  
*[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/E_%3D_mc%C2%B2 Lecture 4 from Wikiversity]
 
*[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/E_%3D_mc%C2%B2 Lecture 4 from Wikiversity]
 
*[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/spacetime_diagrams_and_vectors Lecture 5 from Wikiversity]
 
*[http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special_relativity/spacetime_diagrams_and_vectors Lecture 5 from Wikiversity]
 +
 +
==How '''NOT''' to proselytize==
 +
[[User:Conservative]] ("Cons") has the laudable goal of introducing people to Christianity on the pages of this wiki.  However, I don't think the incredibly obsessive way he does this is likely to be effective.
 +
*He seems obsessed with svelte Indian Christian ladies and their graceful dancing style, as though that should persuade people to embrace Christianity.  (Many references in [[Essay:_Indian_Christian_culture_is_better_than_low_class_atheist_%22culture%22|this article]].)
 +
::"Well, gosh.  Those Indian Christian ladies are so graceful, that must show that Jesus is the son of God.  I'd better join a church right away."
 +
*He also seems obsessed with Penn Jillette's lack of grace when dancing the "Walrus Slide", and with the fact that Ken Ham likes to yodel.  (See [[Essay:_Penn_Jillette%27s_walrus_slide_vs._thin_Indian_Christian_lady_dancers|this article, which is remarkably similar to the one cited just above]].)
 +
::"Well, gosh.  Ken Ham likes to yodel when climbing the Triceratops model at the Creation Museum, and when climbing mountains.  I guess that shows that the universe was created in 6 days, 6000 years ago."
 +
*He also points out that the Swiss like to yodel, [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SamHB#re:_well-intentioned_and_level-headed_people here].
 +
::"Well, gosh.  The Swiss like to yodel.  Jesus is lord!"
 +
*He also likes to point out, in too many places to list here, that non-Western cultures are expanding at the expense of traditional American cultures.  He says this with a degree of glee that makes me wonder whose side he is on.
 +
::"Well, gosh.  Non-Western societies are rapidly growing due to their high birth rate.  I guess I'd better convert to Islam."
 +
*He points out the atheists aren't as good-looking as religious people  [[Atheists and physical attractiveness|here]], as though there is something meaningful that we are supposed to take away from this notion.
 +
::"Well, gosh.  Women don't seem to want to date me.  I guess I'm ugly.  I'd better join a Bible study group at my college.  That will make me better-looking, and I'll get lots of dates."
 +
*And then there's [[Essay:_Militant_atheism_and_short_man's_syndrome|this]] gem.
 +
::"Well, gosh.  I'm kind of short.  Most women I know are taller than I am, and seem not to want to date men shorter than they are.  Maybe if I go to church regularly I'll grow taller.  There ''is'' a causal relationship, isn't there?  It's right in the essay:  "Get over it little man, shortness is a causal factor for militant atheism!"
 +
*He has also been pointing out for several years and "20XX is going to be (or already is) the worst year ever for atheism.  He even made a past-tense claim about a year that is still happening [http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/166#2018_was_a_TERRIBLE_year_for_militant_atheists here].
 +
::"Well, gosh.  After all this, are atheists still around?  How come I still see so many of them?  Does the existence of God not depend on something someone once said in an elevator?"
 +
*He had recently been obsessed with potholes in British streets, even putting an article on the main page for a while.  He apparently wants to use the state of British roads to make some quasi-political, quasi-religious, quasi-scientific argument.
 +
::"Well, gosh.  There are potholes in streets in the UK, and Charles Darwin (more than 100 years ago) was British.  I guess that means that evolution did not occur.  I'm glad people can see these scientific principles so clearly."
 +
Most of his "articles" contain enormous numbers of references to other of his articles, as though that counts as a "reference".
    
==I would really love to see [[User:Conservative]] slowly and painfully burn==
 
==I would really love to see [[User:Conservative]] slowly and painfully burn==
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu