Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
2,001 bytes added ,  04:17, September 3, 2018
→‎Alleged Experimental verification--the Cockcroft-Walton experiment: Expand, and explain the lack of a Nobel prize.
Line 117: Line 117:  
Perhaps the most precise direct empirical verification of E=mc<sup>2</sup> was done in 2005 by Simon Rainville ''et. al.''<ref>[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7071/full/4381096a.html Nature 438, 1096-1097 (22 December 2005)] doi:10.1038/4381096a; Published online 21 December 2005</ref> The article states that &quot;Einstein's relationship is separately confirmed in two tests, which yield a combined result of 1−&Delta;mc²/E=(−1.4±4.4)×10<sup>−7</sup>, indicating that it holds to a level of at least 0.00004%. To our knowledge, this is the most precise direct test of the famous equation yet described.&quot;
 
Perhaps the most precise direct empirical verification of E=mc<sup>2</sup> was done in 2005 by Simon Rainville ''et. al.''<ref>[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7071/full/4381096a.html Nature 438, 1096-1097 (22 December 2005)] doi:10.1038/4381096a; Published online 21 December 2005</ref> The article states that &quot;Einstein's relationship is separately confirmed in two tests, which yield a combined result of 1−&Delta;mc²/E=(−1.4±4.4)×10<sup>−7</sup>, indicating that it holds to a level of at least 0.00004%. To our knowledge, this is the most precise direct test of the famous equation yet described.&quot;
   −
==Alleged Experimental verification--the Cockcroft-Walton experiment==
+
==Experimental verification--the Cockcroft-Walton experiment==
−
In 1932 English physicist John Cockcroft and Irish physicist Ernest Walton performed the first artificial nuclear transmutation of nuclei, for which they were awarded the 1951 [[Nobel Prize]] in physics -- '''''but not for any verification of E=mc²'''''.<ref>[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1951/cockcroft-lecture.pdf John D. Cockroft ''Experiments on the interaction of high-speed nucleons with atomic nuclei''], Nobel Lecture, Dec 11, 1951</ref>  The award was for ''&quot;their pioneer work on the transmutation of atomic nuclei by artificially accelerated atomic particles.&quot;''<ref>[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1951/# Nobel Prize Organization]</ref>  
+
In 1932 English physicist John Cockcroft and Irish physicist Ernest Walton performed the first artificial nuclear transmutation of nuclei, for which they were awarded the 1951 [[Nobel Prize]] in physics.<ref>[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1951/cockcroft-lecture.pdf John D. Cockroft ''Experiments on the interaction of high-speed nucleons with atomic nuclei''], Nobel Lecture, Dec 11, 1951</ref>  The award was for ''&quot;their pioneer work on the transmutation of atomic nuclei by artificially accelerated atomic particles.&quot;''<ref>[http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1951/# Nobel Prize Organization]</ref>  
    
Verifying E=mc² was not the goal of the experiment, and the Nobel prize was awarded for the transmutation itself, not any verification of the equation.  But analysis of the experiment does in fact verify the equation for the transmutation involved.
 
Verifying E=mc² was not the goal of the experiment, and the Nobel prize was awarded for the transmutation itself, not any verification of the equation.  But analysis of the experiment does in fact verify the equation for the transmutation involved.
Line 132: Line 132:  
::::<math>\approx \,17.3\,\mathrm{MeV}</math>
 
::::<math>\approx \,17.3\,\mathrm{MeV}</math>
   −
Accurate measurements and detailed calculations allowed for verifying the theoretical values with an accuracy of ±0.5%. This was the first time a nucleus was artificially split, and thereby the first transmutation of elements using accelerated particles:
+
Accurate measurements and detailed calculations allowed for verifying the theoretical values with an accuracy of ±0.5%. This was the first time a nucleus was artificially split, and thereby the first transmutation of elements using accelerated particles.
 +
 
 +
===Does the Cockcroft/Walton experiment "prove" (or "verify") the equation ''[[E=mc&sup2;]]''?===
 +
With the invention of the mass spectrometer in 1919 by Francis W. Aston]]<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Downard | first1 = KM | year = 2009 | title = Francis William Aston - The Man Behind the Mass Spectrograph | url = | journal = Eur. Mass Spectrom | volume = 13 | issue = | pages = 177–190 | doi= 10.1255/ejms.878}}</ref> in 1919, it became possible to measure atomic masses accurately.  This made it possible to demonstrate multiple isotopes for various element (e.g. Neon) and to measure the various isotopes' [https://www.thebigger.com/chemistry/nuclear-and-radiation-chemistry/what-is-packing-fraction/ packing fraction].  This, in turn, made it possible to validate the equation for radioactive decays with some precision, well before the Cockcroft/Walton experiment.  Modern measurements [[Quantitative Analysis of Alpha Decay|verify it with exquisite accuracy]].
 +
 
 +
Keep in mind that "proving" or "verifying" something is different from "accepting" it.  The recoil from a gun is an example of this.  Everyone knows that there is a backward recoil when a gun is fired.  This is explained to people when they are first being taught how to use a gun, and they get used to it with practice.  The reason for the recoil is that it is an obvious consequence of Newtons' laws of motion.  But people don't specifically think about Newton's laws, or consider this to be a "proof", when they are firing a gun.  They just accept that the recoil is a known consequence of those laws.
 +
 
 +
===Did contemporary scientists believe that the experiment validated E=mc&sup2;?===
 +
It probably didn't convince any skeptics.  The formula had been known, and had been known to have been verified for radioactive decays, for quite some time.  It is more likely that scientists just thought that this experiment was consistent with what they already had good reason to believe was true.
 +
 
 +
===Was the Nobel Prize of 1951 awarded for the experiment's verification of the formula?===
 +
No.
    
==A Famous Example -- Nuclear Fission of Uranium==
 
==A Famous Example -- Nuclear Fission of Uranium==
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu