Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 38:
Line 38: − + − + + +
→Pro-Net Neutrality Argument concerning potential effects on conserv: But the counterargument is that cable companies would provide service to sites preferred by paying customers. Free enterprise typically leads to less censorship, not more.
After Net Neutrality regulations were published, watchdogs noticed that the regulations themselves refer to the group "Free Press" 46 times.<ref>[https://fee.org/articles/net-neutrality-is-about-government-control-of-the-internet/ Net Neutrality Is about Government Control of the Internet]</ref><ref>[http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/12/fcc-cites-soros-funded-neo-marxist-founded-group-46-times-in-new-regs/ FCC Cites Soros-Funded, Neo-Marxist-Founded Group 46 TIMES In New Regs]</ref> "Free Press" is a noted Marxist front group.<ref>[http://dailycaller.com/2015/02/26/a-leading-net-neutrality-activists-neo-marxist-views/ A Leading Net Neutrality Activist’s Neo-Marxist Views]</ref>
After Net Neutrality regulations were published, watchdogs noticed that the regulations themselves refer to the group "Free Press" 46 times.<ref>[https://fee.org/articles/net-neutrality-is-about-government-control-of-the-internet/ Net Neutrality Is about Government Control of the Internet]</ref><ref>[http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/12/fcc-cites-soros-funded-neo-marxist-founded-group-46-times-in-new-regs/ FCC Cites Soros-Funded, Neo-Marxist-Founded Group 46 TIMES In New Regs]</ref> "Free Press" is a noted Marxist front group.<ref>[http://dailycaller.com/2015/02/26/a-leading-net-neutrality-activists-neo-marxist-views/ A Leading Net Neutrality Activist’s Neo-Marxist Views]</ref>
==Effects on conservative websites including Conservapedia==
==Pro-Net Neutrality Argument concerning potential effects on conservative websites==
If not prohibited, better Internet service would be given to those websites and companies with pay more. Large corporations like CNN and ABC would be able to pay these rates, and thus become much more technologically reliable. Smaller websites, especially non-profit ones, would generally be unable to pay the increased rates. Their websites would, therefore, become harder and slower to access, and many users could be turned away as a result. Internet traffic would eventually flow towards the better-funded websites, and away from non-profit sites such as Conservapedia.
If not prohibited, better Internet service could be given to those websites and companies that pay more. Large corporations like CNN and ABC would be able to pay these rates, and thus become much more technologically reliable. Smaller websites, especially non-profit ones, would generally be unable to pay the increased rates. Their websites would, therefore, become harder and slower to access, and many users could be turned away as a result. Internet traffic would eventually flow towards the better-funded websites, and away from non-profit sites such as Conservapedia.
But the counterargument is that cable companies would provide service to sites preferred by paying customers. [[Free enterprise]] typically leads to less [[censorship]], not more.
==References==
==References==