Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
no edit summary
:Add a disambiguation page then!(The beauty of the wiki software ey ;-))[[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 17:22, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
:Add a disambiguation page then!(The beauty of the wiki software ey ;-))[[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 17:22, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
:: It doesn't make sense that one of the largest employers in the world and perhaps the most significant example of a socialised health system (entirely relevant to conservatives one would think) should take precedence over the "National Honor Society", whatever that is? Priceless. [[User:Mralph72|Mralph72]] 08:28, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:: It doesn't make sense that one of the largest employers in the world and perhaps the most significant example of a socialised health system (entirely relevant to conservatives one would think) should take precedence over the "National Honor Society", whatever that is? Priceless. [[User:Mralph72|Mralph72]] 08:28, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
::: "One of the largest employers in the world"? Now there's a claim to fame. The NHS is behind the ... Chinese Army. I guess we need a special entry about that communist entity now too, due to its having so many employees??--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:31, 5 May 2007 (EDT)