Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
62 bytes added ,  09:39, September 7, 2018
See also section - added Stereotype and Racial profiling controversy
Line 33: Line 33:  
Fallacious or weak analogies are frequently used in [[prejudice]]d accusations against [[ethnic group]]s, and in [[polemic]] against [[religions]] and religious practices, and by prosecutors in courts of law to persuade judges and juries of the guilt of the accused.  
 
Fallacious or weak analogies are frequently used in [[prejudice]]d accusations against [[ethnic group]]s, and in [[polemic]] against [[religions]] and religious practices, and by prosecutors in courts of law to persuade judges and juries of the guilt of the accused.  
   −
A classic [[joke]] says, "If it walks like a duck, talks like a duct, and acts like a duck, it must be a duck—unless it's a [[politician]] seeking the duck vote."
+
A classic [[joke]] says, "If it walks like a duck, talks like a duct, and acts like a duck, it must be a duck—unless it's a [[politician]] seeking the duck vote."  
   −
See [[Specious reasoning]]
+
==See also==
 +
[[Specious reasoning]]
 +
 
 +
[[Stereotype]]
 +
 
 +
[[Racial profiling controversy]]
    
[[category:logic]]
 
[[category:logic]]
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:apologetics]]
 
[[category:apologetics]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891

edits

Navigation menu