Changes

:Because the idea of something being secular is just that; that it is not connected with religion in any way. Combine that with the content on Conservapedia, which rather consistently panders to either a conservative or biblical viewpoint, and the idea that something is secular pretty much lends itself to being opposite the views of many of the major contributors of this site, many of whom are Christian themselves.  

:Because the idea of something being secular is just that; that it is not connected with religion in any way. Combine that with the content on Conservapedia, which rather consistently panders to either a conservative or biblical viewpoint, and the idea that something is secular pretty much lends itself to being opposite the views of many of the major contributors of this site, many of whom are Christian themselves.  

Also, if I didn't know better it would seem that your previous comment, Middle Man, indicates that scientists are out to get religion. They're not. There are physical laws in the universe that they simply seek to explain, and whether or not they fit in with things that the bible may say will not make them any more or less true.

:Also, if I didn't know better it would seem that your previous comment, Middle Man, indicates that scientists are out to get religion. They're not. There are physical laws in the universe that they simply seek to explain, and whether or not they fit in with things that the bible may say will not make them any more or less true.

Also, if there's a secular science article, shouldn't there conversely be a theistic science article? Just an idea.

:Also, if there's a secular science article, shouldn't there conversely be a theistic science article? Just an idea.