Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User talk:Logician (view source)
Revision as of 22:52, September 24, 2018
, 22:52, September 24, 2018Created page with "{{welcome}} == Your edits == Thanks for your edits. The problem with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Logic&curid=6906&diff=1450513&oldid=1449298 this one] is..."
{{welcome}}
== Your edits ==
Thanks for your edits.
The problem with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Logic&curid=6906&diff=1450513&oldid=1449298 this one] is that you made numerous major/massive changes all in one edit. The diff is confusing. Rather than simply reverting it all, I am giving you the chance to clarify your edit. Also, what information, exactly, did you remove in that edit? It's unclear. In addition, please explain why you removed "refers to undeniable truth" in the first paragraph.
Regarding [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Principle_of_explosion&curid=100440&diff=1450514&oldid=1231441 this edit], you removed an example that laypeople can understand and replaced it with something most readers won't understand. I support including both -- for the laypeople and for the more knowledgeable people, but you replaced one with the other. I would re-add what you removed, but I'm giving you the chance to do that.
Thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:52, 24 September 2018 (EDT)
== Your edits ==
Thanks for your edits.
The problem with [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Logic&curid=6906&diff=1450513&oldid=1449298 this one] is that you made numerous major/massive changes all in one edit. The diff is confusing. Rather than simply reverting it all, I am giving you the chance to clarify your edit. Also, what information, exactly, did you remove in that edit? It's unclear. In addition, please explain why you removed "refers to undeniable truth" in the first paragraph.
Regarding [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Principle_of_explosion&curid=100440&diff=1450514&oldid=1231441 this edit], you removed an example that laypeople can understand and replaced it with something most readers won't understand. I support including both -- for the laypeople and for the more knowledgeable people, but you replaced one with the other. I would re-add what you removed, but I'm giving you the chance to do that.
Thanks. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 18:52, 24 September 2018 (EDT)