Changes

:I cleaned up the article. I didn't remove content that was good, I just cleaned up the stuff that... wasn't (e.g. "institutional logic", which isn't even logic in the sense of this article). I removed "refers to undeniable truth" because that proposition is false. ''Deductive'' logic when the argument is valid and sound refers to undeniable truth. Logic as an academic field does not (certainly inductive and abductive arguments are not "undeniable truths"). I can create a page with all removed content if you so desire.

:I cleaned up the article. I didn't remove content that was good, I just cleaned up the stuff that... wasn't (e.g. "institutional logic", which isn't even logic in the sense of this article). I removed "refers to undeniable truth" because that proposition is false. ''Deductive'' logic when the argument is valid and sound refers to undeniable truth. Logic as an academic field does not (certainly inductive and abductive arguments are not "undeniable truths"). I can create a page with all removed content if you so desire.

:With regards to the second article: I'll add explanations for the laypeople, but the example before with "I'm wearing red shoes" I think it was and "Obama is a competent president" was confusing and a terrible example of the principle of explosion. In addition to all of this, I'll try to keep edits shorter. [[User:Logician|Logician]] ([[User talk:Logician|talk]]) 19:00, 24 September 2018 (EDT)

:With regards to the second article: I'll add explanations for the laypeople, but the example before with "Red is a colour" and "Obama is a competent president" was confusing and a terrible example of the principle of explosion. In addition to all of this, I'll try to keep edits shorter. [[User:Logician|Logician]] ([[User talk:Logician|talk]]) 19:00, 24 September 2018 (EDT)