Changes

[[File:JanTheRiviter 480x480.jpg|right|225px]]

[[File:JanTheRiviter 480x480.jpg|right|225px]]

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], P.J. Crowley, and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support.<ref>http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref><ref>http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref> It appears that [[liberal]]s are ignorant in or have difficulty in reading the law. The purpose and goal of this article is not to give a comprehensive history of the bill, but so that everyone, especially liberals, can read and understand the bill and things related to the bill. Presented below are all of the 18 final pages of the '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' (also known as '''Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act''') so that liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. The original version can be read [http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf here] and [http://senatebill1070.com/arizona-senate-bill-1070/full-text-of-arizona-senate-bill-1070/ here], but now, the final, complete version can be read here below '''word for word'''. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, [[racial profiling]]. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref>http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.

[[Eric Holder]], [[Janet Napolitano]], P.J. Crowley, and other members of the [[Obama administration]] have admitted that they haven’t read the [[Arizona]] state law on [[illegal immigration]]<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/05/19/john-lott-arizona-immigration-law-read-obama-calderon-holder-napolitano-crowley/</ref> of which 60% - 70% of Americans support.<ref>https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/97483-poll-shows-strong-support-for-arizona-immigration-law</ref><ref>http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/04/29/Poll-Most-support-Arizona-immigration-law/UPI-55921272544207/</ref> It appears that [[liberal]]s are ignorant in or have difficulty in reading the law. The purpose and goal of this article is not to give a comprehensive history of the bill, but so that everyone, especially liberals, can read and understand the bill and things related to the bill. Presented below are all of the 18 final pages of the '''Arizona Senate Bill 1070''' (also known as '''Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act''') so that liberals like the people mentioned above won’t have such a hard time reading the law. The original version can be read [http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/sb1070s.pdf here] and [http://senatebill1070.com/arizona-senate-bill-1070/full-text-of-arizona-senate-bill-1070/ here], but now, the final, complete version can be read here below '''word for word'''. Liberals, you have no excuse for not reading this bill. It actually prohibits, not encourage, [[racial profiling]]. Also, as shall be seen below, Arizona’s new immigration bill is much milder than that of Mexico’s and even American immigration policy, which liberals apparently are ignorant of. All the new bill does is make Arizona law mirror federal immigration law.<ref>https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65340</ref> Liberals, read the new law for yourselves once and for all, please.

Notes: The CAPITALIZED text is amendments of the original bill. The ''italicized'' text denotes changes made

Notes: The CAPITALIZED text is amendments of the original bill. The ''italicized'' text denotes changes made

A comparison reveals that the Arizona Immigration law is less tough and less stricter than current U.S immigration policy requiring alien documentation. Here some of the points of the U.S immigration policy.  

A comparison reveals that the Arizona Immigration law is less tough and less stricter than current U.S immigration policy requiring alien documentation. Here some of the points of the U.S immigration policy.  

In 2005 as a result of the Muller vs. Mena case, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that under Federal Law, cops can pull you over for no reason and demand to see your immigration papers. However, under Arizona’s new law, they do have to have a reason.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvmypNc7c74</ref>  

In 2005 as a result of the Muller vs. Mena case, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that under Federal Law, cops can pull you over for no reason and demand to see your immigration papers. However, under Arizona’s new law, they do have to have a reason.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvmypNc7c74</ref>  

If illegal entrants to the U.S spend a total of 1 year’s unlawful time in the U.S or are ordered deported by a federal judge (even after spending less than 1 year in the U.S) and then they leave and return or attempt to return to the United States illegally, they become permanently inadmissible. This so-called permanent bar is found at § I.N.A 212(a)(9)(C), 8 U.S.C § 1182(a)(9)(c).<ref>http://books.google.com/books?id=8vNnXnJChsoC&pg=PA54&lpg=PA54&dq=u.s+immigration+laws&source=bll&ots=bEJJd7iHua&sig=BwWU_tuYtZ8BXRu0DaLnMRQZeS4&hl=en&ei=gmYATKzRK8LflgfgjoH8CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=18&ved=0CGwQ6AEwEQ#v=onepage&q=u.s%20immigration%20laws&f=false</ref>

If illegal entrants to the U.S spend a total of 1 year’s unlawful time in the U.S or are ordered deported by a federal judge (even after spending less than 1 year in the U.S) and then they leave and return or attempt to return to the United States illegally, they become permanently inadmissible. This so-called permanent bar is found at § I.N.A 212(a)(9)(C), 8 U.S.C § 1182(a)(9)(c).<ref>https://books.google.com/books?id=8vNnXnJChsoC&pg=PA54&lpg=PA54&dq=u.s+immigration+laws&source=bll&ots=bEJJd7iHua&sig=BwWU_tuYtZ8BXRu0DaLnMRQZeS4&hl=en&ei=gmYATKzRK8LflgfgjoH8CQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=18&ved=0CGwQ6AEwEQ#v=onepage&q=u.s%20immigration%20laws&f=false</ref>

If an alien fails to update the government with a residential address every three months, regardless of whether the address has changed would render the alien deportable.<ref>http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Immigration</ref>

If an alien fails to update the government with a residential address every three months, regardless of whether the address has changed would render the alien deportable.<ref>http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/Immigration</ref>

== Mexico's immigration policy vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

== Mexico's immigration policy vs. Arizona Senate Bill 1070 ==

Now, what about Mexico’s immigration policy? Mexico’s immigration policy is even harsher of which Mexican president and America basher [[Felipe Calderon]] seems to be ignorant of since he has attacked and “lectured” the American people on Arizona’s new law,<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQhVfRwEE4</ref> which begs the question: Has he read the new Arizona immigration law and does he read his own laws, especially the ones that has to do with immigration? Just in case he hasn't, here are some of the points of Mexico’s immigration policy:  

Now, what about Mexico’s immigration policy? Mexico’s immigration policy is even harsher of which Mexican president and America basher [[Felipe Calderon]] seems to be ignorant of since he has attacked and “lectured” the American people on Arizona’s new law,<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQQhVfRwEE4</ref> which begs the question: Has he read the new Arizona immigration law and does he read his own laws, especially the ones that has to do with immigration? Just in case he hasn't, here are some of the points of Mexico’s immigration policy:  

The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset "the equilibrium of the national demographics."

The Mexican government will bar foreigners if they upset "the equilibrium of the national demographics."

-Ready to show your papers? Mexico's National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens' identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest as illegal aliens.  

-Ready to show your papers? Mexico's National Catalog of Foreigners tracks all outside tourists and foreign nationals. A National Population Registry tracks and verifies the identity of every member of the population, who must carry a citizens' identity card. Visitors who do not possess proper documents and identification are subject to arrest as illegal aliens.  

All of these provisions are enshrined in Mexico's Ley General de Población (General Law of the Population) and were spotlighted in a 2006 research paper published by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy. There's been no public clamor for "comprehensive immigration reform" in Mexico, however, because pro-illegal alien speech by outsiders is prohibited<ref>http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1929981</ref><ref>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/</ref>

All of these provisions are enshrined in Mexico's Ley General de Población (General Law of the Population) and were spotlighted in a 2006 research paper published by the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Security Policy. There's been no public clamor for "comprehensive immigration reform" in Mexico, however, because pro-illegal alien speech by outsiders is prohibited<ref>http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1929981</ref><ref>https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/03/mexicos-illegals-laws-tougher-than-arizonas/</ref>

Liberals, how's that for racial profiling?

Liberals, how's that for racial profiling?

#If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?

#If you currently have nothing to back up your reasons why you hate the bill so much, on what basis do you criticize the bill?

#Did you know that there are other states that have tougher immigration policies than Arizona's new act on illegal immigration? Why do you only criticize Arizona, but not other states for their much harsher immigration policies?

#Did you know that there are other states that have tougher immigration policies than Arizona's new act on illegal immigration? Why do you only criticize Arizona, but not other states for their much harsher immigration policies?

#A member of the Somalian Al Shabaab terrorist group may be trying to get into Texas through Mexico. U.S. Homeland Security has asked law enforcement in Houston to be on the lookout for a suspected member of Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida ally based in Somalia.<ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37368665</ref><ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSrvfP_Ua8</ref> With this in mind, do you prefer Arizona’s new enforcement law against illegal immigration over terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States? Or do you prefer terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States over Arizona’s enforcement law against illegal immigration? Which of the 2 options would you pick if you had to and why?

#A member of the Somalian Al Shabaab terrorist group may be trying to get into Texas through Mexico. U.S. Homeland Security has asked law enforcement in Houston to be on the lookout for a suspected member of Al Shabaab, an Al Qaida ally based in Somalia.<ref>http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37368665</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlSrvfP_Ua8</ref> With this in mind, do you prefer Arizona’s new enforcement law against illegal immigration over terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States? Or do you prefer terrorists attempting to cross the border illegally to commit acts of terror in the United States over Arizona’s enforcement law against illegal immigration? Which of the 2 options would you pick if you had to and why?

#Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?

#Let's see if you understand the bill if you have sincerely read it. In your own words, how would you summarize the bill?

#Liberals, now that you've read everything here, what's your response? Your responses should be made in the form of a YouTube video.

#Liberals, now that you've read everything here, what's your response? Your responses should be made in the form of a YouTube video.