Changes
/* Young Earth Creationism View */
. . . it is an elegant structure that shows both order and complexity. . . . The end product is especially remarkable in the light of what is believed to be the starting point: nebulous blobs of gas. How the universe made the Milky Way from such simple beginnings is not altogether clear. - Cristina Chiappini, "The Formation and Evolution of the Milky Way," American Scientist (vol. 89, Nov./Dec. 2001), p. 506. <ref>http://www.icr.org/article/547/</ref>
</blockquote>
The Institute for Creation Research wrote the following regarding a 2005 article in [[Science News]]:
<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
A strange cartoon graced the cover of Science News last fall (10/08/2005) that serves as a symbol for a whole class of problems for evolutionary astronomers. It showed a star-shaped old man in a stellar maternity ward. With its title, "Crisis in the Cosmos? Galaxy-formation theory is in peril," the article exposed a running theme in astronomy: as far back as we look, stars and galaxies appear mature.
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
"Imagine peering into a nursery and seeing, among the cooing babies, a few that look like grown men," Ron Cowen quipped. "That's the startling situation that astronomers have stumbled upon as they've looked deep into space and thus back to a time when newborn galaxies filled the cosmos."....
</blockquote>
<blockquote style="background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; padding: .3em;">
These findings corroborate a January 8, 2002, NASA press release that was considered astonishing at the time: based on Hubble surveys, "the grand finale came first" in stellar and galactic evolution. As far back as telescopes look, they see mature creation, not evolution.
</blockquote>
Young earth creationists also cite the following:
