Changes

* If you want to know why almost all of the responses to my original post consist of personal attacks on me, along with irrelevant mentions of [[Fox News]], ''The Wall Street Journal'', [[Newt Gingrich]], [[Rick Santorum]] and [[George Zimmerman]], it is because [[black studies]] is a cause, not a course of study. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304363104577391842133259230.html?mod=googlenews_wsj]

* If you want to know why almost all of the responses to my original post consist of personal attacks on me, along with irrelevant mentions of [[Fox News]], ''The Wall Street Journal'', [[Newt Gingrich]], [[Rick Santorum]] and [[George Zimmerman]], it is because [[black studies]] is a cause, not a course of study. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304363104577391842133259230.html?mod=googlenews_wsj]

[[Abraham Miller]] said the ''Chronicle'' fired Riley "for writing a piece at variance with the [[political correctness]] it has come to uphold."<ref name=thinker-Miller>[http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/naomi_schaefer_riley_and_the_corruption_of_the_academy.html Naomi Schaefer Riley and the Corruption of the Academy] - Abraham H. Miller</ref> and thereby "inadvertently gave Riley's exposé on black studies far and away more visibility than it would otherwise have achieved."<ref name=thinker-Miller />  

[[Abraham Miller]] said the ''Chronicle'' fired Riley "for writing a piece at variance with the [[political correctness]] it has come to uphold."<ref name=thinker-Miller>[https://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/naomi_schaefer_riley_and_the_corruption_of_the_academy.html Naomi Schaefer Riley and the Corruption of the Academy] - Abraham H. Miller</ref> and thereby "inadvertently gave Riley's exposé on black studies far and away more visibility than it would otherwise have achieved."<ref name=thinker-Miller />  

==See also==

==See also==