nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 259:
Line 259: + + +
→Conflict of Interest?: No, it's not.
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] appears to be the primary editor on this page, and also the editor who has a hammer lock on the [[Evolution]] page. Isn't this an inherent conflict of interest? I appreciate that the purpose of this wiki is to present the conservative spin on things, and not necessarily the objective truth, but surely having a single person's POV coloring two diametrically opposed articles is contrary to that mission. [[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 22:49, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] appears to be the primary editor on this page, and also the editor who has a hammer lock on the [[Evolution]] page. Isn't this an inherent conflict of interest? I appreciate that the purpose of this wiki is to present the conservative spin on things, and not necessarily the objective truth, but surely having a single person's POV coloring two diametrically opposed articles is contrary to that mission. [[User:Stile4aly|Stile4aly]] 22:49, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:Didn't you know? The "conservative spin" IS "the objective truth". :-)
:Seriously, it's not a conflict of interest to edit two articles with opposing viewpoints. If that was the case, it effectively means that only conservatives could edit some articles and only liberals could edit other articles, etc.
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)