67
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 72:
Line 72: − + + + + +
→Vandalism
: Let me know if any sysops express the opinion that my version is vandalism.
: Let me know if any sysops express the opinion that my version is vandalism.
: Your stuff is junk. Your sources are just obscure and incoherent opinions pieces. Do you have some disagreement with the text that you removed? If so, what? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 04:38, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
: Your stuff is junk. Your sources are just obscure and incoherent opinions pieces. Do you have some disagreement with the text that you removed? If so, what? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 04:38,
6 May 2007 (EDT)
Exactly in what way is my stuff junk? I have used Galieleo's OWN WORDS and I have used a reference to a interpreation of the Galileo repudiation of Heliocentrism by by a Catholic Scholar. EXACTLY WHY IS THAT JUNK?? You offend me by saying that. I have cited my sources which is more than the rest of the article is doing. Would it not have been best to engage in dialogue before you remove stuff? On what grounds are you the arbiter of what, or should not be in this article? [[OfficerDibble]]