Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
→‎Discrimination Against Religious Schools: HTTP --> HTTPS [#1], replaced: http://www.nytimes.com → https://www.nytimes.com
Line 23: Line 23:  
== Discrimination Against Religious Schools ==
 
== Discrimination Against Religious Schools ==
   −
While Christian teachers are not censored and forbidden to express their religious views at private, Christian schools, they are nonetheless discriminated against by the larger educational system—often at the expense of their students.  In 2005, a group of students from Southern California evangelical schools filed suit against the University of California for religious discrimination.  Despite having extremely high grades and test scores, they argued that the university's refusal to certify many of the courses offered by their high school amounted to discrimination.<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/20/national/20christian.html?ei=5090&en=887978c7a8153d97&ex=1290142800&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
+
While Christian teachers are not censored and forbidden to express their religious views at private, Christian schools, they are nonetheless discriminated against by the larger educational system—often at the expense of their students.  In 2005, a group of students from Southern California evangelical schools filed suit against the University of California for religious discrimination.  Despite having extremely high grades and test scores, they argued that the university's refusal to certify many of the courses offered by their high school amounted to discrimination.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/20/national/20christian.html?ei=5090&en=887978c7a8153d97&ex=1290142800&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
 
</ref>  The case, ''Association of Christian Schools International v. Roman Stearns,'' culminated in a ruling by [[activist judge]] S. James Otero, who sided with the University.<ref>http://www.dailycal.org/article/101093/judge_backs_uc_on_admissions_requirements</ref> Otero agreed with the defendants' argument that the textbooks used by Cavalry Chapel Christian School were unacceptable because they reflected a Christian viewpoint.
 
</ref>  The case, ''Association of Christian Schools International v. Roman Stearns,'' culminated in a ruling by [[activist judge]] S. James Otero, who sided with the University.<ref>http://www.dailycal.org/article/101093/judge_backs_uc_on_admissions_requirements</ref> Otero agreed with the defendants' argument that the textbooks used by Cavalry Chapel Christian School were unacceptable because they reflected a Christian viewpoint.
  
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,161

edits

Navigation menu