1,507 bytes added
, 17:21, May 6, 2007
Implying on the front page that the deaths of 35 people are not tragic is kind of tacky.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:42, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:Agreed! [[User:Tribal Totem|Tribal Totem]] 12:43, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
::Perhaps they were bad people... They seem to have mostly been foreigners, after all. [http://www.garemaritime.com/features/hindenburg/hindenburg_final_voyage_passenger_list.php] --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 12:50, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
The notion that the airships like the Hindenburg had a future is not correct. Passanger jets would regularly cross the Atlantic within twenty years of the disaster. If anything, the US Navy already knew that airships were not relaible, having lost several in the 1930s, as shown here <ttp://spot.colorado.edu/~dziadeck/airship/usa.htm>--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 13:17, 6 May 2007 (EDT)(forgot time stamp)
:Please correct the article, then. And while you're at it, don't make those 35 lives sound so devalued. I can't stand that.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:15, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Ames, your criticism is '''completely''' misplaced. Nobody devalues any lives on Conservapedia. The point is obvious to the open-minded and if you think politically correct censorship works here, forget it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:21, 6 May 2007 (EDT)