1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 100:
Line 100: + + +
→Suggested Changes: So how do you explain plants living without sunlight?
I also think we should add some links to Pro-Geocentric sites, Here are a few that I know of:1) [http://www.geocentricity.com/ geocentricity.com] 2) [http://www.fixedearth.com/ fixedearth.com] 3) [http://www.catholicintl.com/epologetics/articles/science/scicreed.htm Three] 4) [http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentricity-101-part-i.html Four] 5)[http://www.galileowaswrong.com/ galileowaswrong.com]. I've heard somebody suggest that fixedearth.com may be a parody site, I think its real, it isn't really funny or trying to be funny like a parrody would. Sure in a few places the author presents his views in a slightly light hearted way but I don't see anything wrong with that.[[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 14:01, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
I also think we should add some links to Pro-Geocentric sites, Here are a few that I know of:1) [http://www.geocentricity.com/ geocentricity.com] 2) [http://www.fixedearth.com/ fixedearth.com] 3) [http://www.catholicintl.com/epologetics/articles/science/scicreed.htm Three] 4) [http://veritas-catholic.blogspot.com/2005/08/geocentricity-101-part-i.html Four] 5)[http://www.galileowaswrong.com/ galileowaswrong.com]. I've heard somebody suggest that fixedearth.com may be a parody site, I think its real, it isn't really funny or trying to be funny like a parrody would. Sure in a few places the author presents his views in a slightly light hearted way but I don't see anything wrong with that.[[User:Mmeelliissssaa|Mmeelliissssaa]] 14:01, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
: So how do you explain plants living without sunlight? Maybe the answer could go in an article on Genesis.
: Do any of those sites say that mainstream physics is wrong is some testable way? Has anyone done the tests? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 14:19, 6 May 2007 (EDT)