| | These percentages reflect ''most likely'' percentages according to the author and are not rounded to appropriate degrees of accuracy in order to be useful for comparison or gradually lowering precision calculation purposes. | | These percentages reflect ''most likely'' percentages according to the author and are not rounded to appropriate degrees of accuracy in order to be useful for comparison or gradually lowering precision calculation purposes. |
| − | : Excellent! Excellent! (except the figures for 1943 probably do not include penal battallions cause, as Solzhenitsyn said, the figures are hard to come by and may never be known. All we know is they were able bodied males, likely 18 years old up, and hardened violent criminals. You'd probably have to look at comparative career, non-property crime, males in other populations to arrive at an estimate. These were disposed of in military penal battallions). And yes, using a figure like the "unborn" corrupts methodology; it's like saying how many jobs ''could'' have been created in America if the Social Security Act of 1936 were not passed. Nonetheless, we still could place this chart in the article with a link citation, and simply say, "According to James B. Whatever blah blah blah...." and let the reader discover the notes on methodology themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 12:36, 11 October 2018 (EDT) | + | : Excellent! Excellent! (<S>except the figures for 1943 probably do not include penal battallions cause, as Solzhenitsyn said, the figures are hard to come by and may never be known. All we know is they were able bodied males, likely 18 years old up, and hardened violent criminals. You'd probably have to look at comparative career, non-property crime, males in other populations to arrive at an estimate. These were disposed of in military penal battallions</s> I misread the chart, taking the figure from the wrong column). And yes, using a figure like the "unborn" corrupts methodology; it's like saying how many jobs ''could'' have been created in America if the Social Security Act of 1936 were not passed. Nonetheless, we still could place this chart in the article with a link citation, and simply say, "According to James B. Whatever blah blah blah...." and let the reader discover the notes on methodology themselves. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 12:36, 11 October 2018 (EDT) |