64
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Nazism
Implying on the front page that the deaths of 35 people are not tragic is kind of tacky.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 12:42, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:Agreed! [[User:Tribal Totem|Tribal Totem]] 12:43, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
::Perhaps they were bad people... They seem to have mostly been foreigners, after all. [http://www.garemaritime.com/features/hindenburg/hindenburg_final_voyage_passenger_list.php] --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 12:50, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
The notion that the airships like the Hindenburg had a future is not correct. Passanger jets would regularly cross the Atlantic within twenty years of the disaster. If anything, the US Navy already knew that airships were not relaible, having lost several in the 1930s, as shown here <ttp://spot.colorado.edu/~dziadeck/airship/usa.htm>--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 13:17, 6 May 2007 (EDT)(forgot time stamp)
:Please correct the article, then. And while you're at it, don't make those 35 lives sound so devalued. I can't stand that.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:15, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Ames, your criticism is '''completely''' misplaced. Nobody devalues any lives on Conservapedia. The point is obvious to the open-minded and if you think politically correct censorship works here, forget it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:21, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
I’m a little bothered by the insinuation that the people who did not jump remained calm. I suspect they did not get the chance to jump. Anyone who has seen the newsreel footage knows that this happened very quickly. Somehow, I think that if most people had several hundred pounds of flammable gas ignite over their heads, “calm” would not be the way to describe their reaction. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 13:23, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:Andy, characterizing it as a "media hysteria" even without reference to, or with passing, glancing reference to the tragedy is insensitive.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:25, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
== Nazism ==
You're article seems to suggest that the US boycott of Nazi Germany was a bad thing. I assume that you did not mean to imply this. Could someone maybe comment on this? When I do a google search on "boycott Hindenburg helium" I get WashTimes, Chron, and other papers, but the first site to come up is a neo nazi site called adolfthegreat.com. May I add a comment here about the ''reasons'' the US boycotted the evil, atheist Nazi regime?[[User:MoshiachNow|MoshiachNow]] 16:45, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:Agreed! [[User:Tribal Totem|Tribal Totem]] 12:43, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
::Perhaps they were bad people... They seem to have mostly been foreigners, after all. [http://www.garemaritime.com/features/hindenburg/hindenburg_final_voyage_passenger_list.php] --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 12:50, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
The notion that the airships like the Hindenburg had a future is not correct. Passanger jets would regularly cross the Atlantic within twenty years of the disaster. If anything, the US Navy already knew that airships were not relaible, having lost several in the 1930s, as shown here <ttp://spot.colorado.edu/~dziadeck/airship/usa.htm>--[[User:1048247|1048247]] 13:17, 6 May 2007 (EDT)(forgot time stamp)
:Please correct the article, then. And while you're at it, don't make those 35 lives sound so devalued. I can't stand that.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:15, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Ames, your criticism is '''completely''' misplaced. Nobody devalues any lives on Conservapedia. The point is obvious to the open-minded and if you think politically correct censorship works here, forget it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:21, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
I’m a little bothered by the insinuation that the people who did not jump remained calm. I suspect they did not get the chance to jump. Anyone who has seen the newsreel footage knows that this happened very quickly. Somehow, I think that if most people had several hundred pounds of flammable gas ignite over their heads, “calm” would not be the way to describe their reaction. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 13:23, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:Andy, characterizing it as a "media hysteria" even without reference to, or with passing, glancing reference to the tragedy is insensitive.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 13:25, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
== Nazism ==
You're article seems to suggest that the US boycott of Nazi Germany was a bad thing. I assume that you did not mean to imply this. Could someone maybe comment on this? When I do a google search on "boycott Hindenburg helium" I get WashTimes, Chron, and other papers, but the first site to come up is a neo nazi site called adolfthegreat.com. May I add a comment here about the ''reasons'' the US boycotted the evil, atheist Nazi regime?[[User:MoshiachNow|MoshiachNow]] 16:45, 6 May 2007 (EDT)