Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,927
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: − +
→Holding the author accountable
===Holding the author accountable===
===Holding the author accountable===
As can be seen, the reputation of a news organization or individual journalist can change over time, either improved or loss of credibility.
As can be seen, the reputation of a news organization or individual journalist can change over time, to either improve or loose credibility.
''[[The New Yorker]]'' for example, once had a reputation for vigorous fact checking. However after such stories as on the credibility of [[Wikipedia]], its fictionalized account of the death of [[bin Laden]], its hit piece on the person and character of ''American Sniper'' hero [[Chris Kyle]], and it's partisan, sloppy, and outrageous attacks on [[Brett Kavanaugh]], have called ''The New Yorker's'' viability as a reputable source into question.
''[[The New Yorker]]'' for example, once had a reputation for vigorous fact checking. However after such stories as on the credibility of [[Wikipedia]], its fictionalized account of the death of [[bin Laden]], its hit piece on the person and character of ''American Sniper'' hero [[Chris Kyle]], and it's partisan, sloppy, and outrageous attacks on [[Brett Kavanaugh]], have called ''The New Yorker's'' viability as a reputable source into question.