Changes

NATO was created as a defense alliance to [[containment|contain Soviet expansionism]] after 1945, and not to wage a War of Aggression in [[Africa]] against [[Libya]],<ref>https://www.pambazuka.org/human-security/libya-natos-war-aggression-sovereign-african-state</ref> as [[Barack Obama]], [[Hillary Clinton]], [[John Brennan]], and [[John McCain]] authorized in 2011. After the reckless misuse of such a powerful [[military]] alliance resulting in a massive humanitarian and [[refugee]] crisis - including the resurgence of black African [[slave]] markets<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2017/11/27/africans_are_being_sold_in_libya_thank_clintonobama_427490.html Africans Are Being Sold in Libya. Thank Clinton/Obama.] Glenn Reynolds, [[USA Today]], November 27, 2017</ref> - the future of a military establishment created to defend against the [[Soviet Union]] (which hasn't existed since 1991) is front and center before American voters. Indeed, the [[Trump-Russia collusion hoax]] was an effort by power entrenched [[globalism|global]] interests of the [[military industrial complex]] to keep up the myth of the aggressive Russian bogeyman, to maintain the [[status quo]] and justify keeping the cost burden on U.S. taxpayers for European defense and Europe's bloated social welfare state.

NATO was created as a defense alliance to [[containment|contain Soviet expansionism]] after 1945, and not to wage a War of Aggression in [[Africa]] against [[Libya]],<ref>https://www.pambazuka.org/human-security/libya-natos-war-aggression-sovereign-african-state</ref> as [[Barack Obama]], [[Hillary Clinton]], [[John Brennan]], and [[John McCain]] authorized in 2011. After the reckless misuse of such a powerful [[military]] alliance resulting in a massive humanitarian and [[refugee]] crisis - including the resurgence of black African [[slave]] markets<ref>[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2017/11/27/africans_are_being_sold_in_libya_thank_clintonobama_427490.html Africans Are Being Sold in Libya. Thank Clinton/Obama.] Glenn Reynolds, [[USA Today]], November 27, 2017</ref> - the future of a military establishment created to defend against the [[Soviet Union]] (which hasn't existed since 1991) is front and center before American voters. Indeed, the [[Trump-Russia collusion hoax]] was an effort by power entrenched [[globalism|global]] interests of the [[military industrial complex]] to keep up the myth of the aggressive Russian bogeyman, to maintain the [[status quo]] and justify keeping the cost burden on U.S. taxpayers for European defense and Europe's bloated social welfare state.

===Inflammatory rhetoric===

===Heated rhetoric===

After President Trump's first 100 days a [[Harvard]] study found CNN and [[NBC]]'s coverage 93 percent negative, more than three times that of Obama, and only 5 percent positive.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harvard-study-cnn-nbc-trump-coverage-93-percent-negative?_amp=true</ref> By December 2017 a Pew Research study found 63 percent negative coverage of Trump by all [[mainstream media]].<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pew-trump-media-three-times-more-negative-than-for-obama-just-5-percent-positive?_amp=true</ref>

After President Trump's first 100 days a [[Harvard]] study found CNN and [[NBC]]'s coverage 93 percent negative, more than three times that of Obama, and only 5 percent positive.<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harvard-study-cnn-nbc-trump-coverage-93-percent-negative?_amp=true</ref> By December 2017 a Pew Research study found 63 percent negative coverage of Trump by all [[mainstream media]].<ref>https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pew-trump-media-three-times-more-negative-than-for-obama-just-5-percent-positive?_amp=true</ref>