Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Essay:Creationist Behavior on Conservapedia

24 bytes removed, 22:47, May 6, 2007
/* Point by Point to the Companion Article, [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]] */
# Overbroad concepts are attributed to "only" liberals, such as, [[deceit]]. Where editors seek to note examples of creationist deceit, such as outright lies to a federal judge, the examples are stricken without anything more than righteous indignation as an explanation. In this sense, liberals (which, remember, are everyone who is not a creationist) are the definition of evil, a larger-than-life force for wrong.
# Attribution of vandalism to liberals ''only'', and definition of liberalism as inherently a philosophy built on destruction.
# Creationists implement rules designed to discourage debate, such as the "90/10" rule. Editors are told to stop talking, and start working, but when they are then forced to defend their edits against absurd objections (see [[stereotype]]), and the talk-page edit count goes up, the editors are then told to go back to work, and move on, abandoning their previous work. The same rules are also selectively enforced. [[user:TK|TK]], for example, admits to Many administrators do not writing any articles, only talking & blockingengage in productive article creation.
# Creationists use bad math to score ideological points, and employ professions of a misunderstanding of basic ratio mathematics, followed by a blocking of all dissenters, to defend absurd numerological constructs.
# Creationists rely on the word "liberal," a term of derision to them, to be an argument-stopper, and an immediate way to discredit any evidence that might point against their causes.
2,732
edits