Changes

How to deal with the children of illegal immigrants was not an issue in the era when the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted. The purpose of the amendment was to assure that former slaves were granted full civil rights, including the right to vote. Given this context, the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" can be interpreted to mean that the child cannot be considered a citizen of a foreign power and is thus under exclusive American jurisdiction.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/donald-trump-end-birthright-citizenship-by-executive-order/</ref>

How to deal with the children of illegal immigrants was not an issue in the era when the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted. The purpose of the amendment was to assure that former slaves were granted full civil rights, including the right to vote. Given this context, the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" can be interpreted to mean that the child cannot be considered a citizen of a foreign power and is thus under exclusive American jurisdiction.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/donald-trump-end-birthright-citizenship-by-executive-order/</ref>

In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court cited the Fourteenth Amendment in the citizenship case of Wong Kim Ark, the child of legal Chinese immigrants.

In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court cited the Fourteenth Amendment in the citizenship case of Wong Kim Ark, a child of legal Chinese immigrants. This is the only time the U.S. courts have considered the issue of birthright citizenship.

There is a long tradition that children born to foreign diplomats while in the United States do not thereby become [[American]] citizens. American Indians were not granted citizenship by the Fourteenth Amendment, but rather by the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.

There is a long tradition that children born to foreign diplomats while in the United States do not thereby become [[American]] citizens. American Indians were not granted citizenship by the Fourteenth Amendment, but rather by the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.