1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
Loving v Virginia
''"AmesG also had substantial input to this article: Substantive due process."''
''"AmesG also had substantial input to this article: Substantive due process."''
--I am mightily inmpressed! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 03:55, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
--I am mightily inmpressed! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 03:55, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
== Loving v Virginia ==
Why is there a long discussion of this case, when it didn't even involve substantive due process? One line of dicta does not justify it. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 19:35, 6 May 2007 (EDT)