1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: − +
question dubious statement about Scalia
sharply dissents from almost all cases upholding substantive due
sharply dissents from almost all cases upholding substantive due
process, believing that there are no fundamental rights if they are not
process, believing that there are no fundamental rights if they are not
defined by the constitution, or discoverable from American history.
defined by the constitution, or discoverable from American history.{{fact}}
== Lochner Era, and Before ==
== Lochner Era, and Before ==