32
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 45:
Line 45: + + +
no edit summary
:::It's a waste of time to even try and fit this group in with either party's traditional social & economic positions, other than support for military industrial complex. They're not really even a voting block, and, no one considers them as such. They are for the most part a group of foreign policy experts. At one time they were considered non-partisan, but they've aroused so much opposition in both parties, they weigh on media allies more and more to fight back. They don't amount to more than a few thousand at best, and they idea of making a voting constituency of them is ludicrous. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters are going down'']]</sup> 22:23, 22 April 2017 (EDT)
:::It's a waste of time to even try and fit this group in with either party's traditional social & economic positions, other than support for military industrial complex. They're not really even a voting block, and, no one considers them as such. They are for the most part a group of foreign policy experts. At one time they were considered non-partisan, but they've aroused so much opposition in both parties, they weigh on media allies more and more to fight back. They don't amount to more than a few thousand at best, and they idea of making a voting constituency of them is ludicrous. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters are going down'']]</sup> 22:23, 22 April 2017 (EDT)
This article might need to be looked at for in accurate information.
[[User:Reevestehsnek|Reevestehsnek]]<sup>[[User talk:Reevestehsnek]]</sup> 14:17, 8 November 2018 (EDT)
== Is it a neo-con position to advocate going to war with Germany if it continues its increasingly aggressive European integration efforts? ==
== Is it a neo-con position to advocate going to war with Germany if it continues its increasingly aggressive European integration efforts? ==