47
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Locks and Blocks (view source)
Revision as of 03:39, May 7, 2007
, 03:39, May 7, 2007no edit summary
#*If you claim that there is one, point to an official page saying so - I'm not the only one who missed it then. It's not in the rules, the differences page or the main page.
#*If you claim that there is one, point to an official page saying so - I'm not the only one who missed it then. It's not in the rules, the differences page or the main page.
#*Suggestion: Admit the bias on the front page. Don't pack it into lawyer speak, euphemisms or terms that will be misunderstood (like "conservative values" - it has been often shown that Andy's view of that term is NOT a widely accepted standard, and many self-described conservatives here were quite surprised at who Andy called "not conservative"). Just flat out state that this site openly supports YEC and such. Then you'd have some sort of rough site philosophy. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 12:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
#*Suggestion: Admit the bias on the front page. Don't pack it into lawyer speak, euphemisms or terms that will be misunderstood (like "conservative values" - it has been often shown that Andy's view of that term is NOT a widely accepted standard, and many self-described conservatives here were quite surprised at who Andy called "not conservative"). Just flat out state that this site openly supports YEC and such. Then you'd have some sort of rough site philosophy. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 12:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
== Cursing ==
You should put on there cursing is a blockable offense only if your not a sysop or admin. Because I have seen sysops say the word Bastard and they were never blocked. Isn't this contrary to what you are saying? Shouldn't sysops set an example on how to behave on conservapedia? --[[User:FredK|FredK]] 23:39, 6 May 2007 (EDT)