Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,506
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + +
no edit summary
What's confusing is, why would Acosta supporters want it out? If the Trump WH is indeed wrong, why should details of the incident be censored? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 17:55, 20 November 2018 (EST)
What's confusing is, why would Acosta supporters want it out? If the Trump WH is indeed wrong, why should details of the incident be censored? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 17:55, 20 November 2018 (EST)
What the Acosta incident recalls an ACLU lawsuit in the 1990s. Public libraries were throwing out the homeless for not showering. They didn't have written policies. Now they have extensive lists of dos and donts (kinda like the 10 commandments) posted in public buildings.
At a local University I read the Visitor Rules (formulated after the 1960s riots). They were very very detailed. Additionally, each clause ended with "...for this, or any other reason...", campus security had the right to throw anyone off campus - meaning they could invite cause our of thin air. The Appeal Rights read the same way. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 18:04, 20 November 2018 (EST)