| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | '''Standing''' is the legal right to bring a lawsuit. Only a person with something actually at stake in a dispute has standing to bring a lawsuit. In federal court, legal standing is required by Article III, Section 2 of the [[U.S. Constitution]], which requires existence of a real case or controversy rather than a merely hypothetical dispute. As the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has explained: | + | '''Standing''' is the legal right to bring a lawsuit. Only a person with something actually at stake in a dispute has standing to bring a lawsuit. In federal court, legal standing is required by Article III, Section 2 of the [[U.S. Constitution]], which requires existence of a real case or controversy rather than a merely hypothetical dispute. |
| − | {{cquote|To qualify for standing, a claimant must present an injury that is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent; fairly traceable to the defendant's challenged behavior; and likely to be redressed by a favorable ruling.}}
| |
| | | | |
| | The Supreme Court has summarized this rule as follows: | | The Supreme Court has summarized this rule as follows: |
| | {{cquote|To qualify for standing, a claimant must present an injury that is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent; fairly traceable to the defendant's challenged behavior; and likely to be redressed by a favorable ruling.}} | | {{cquote|To qualify for standing, a claimant must present an injury that is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent; fairly traceable to the defendant's challenged behavior; and likely to be redressed by a favorable ruling.}} |
| − | ''Davis v. FEC'', 554 U.S. 724, 733 (2008) (citing ''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]'', 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992)). | + | ::''Davis v. FEC'', 554 U.S. 724, 733 (2008) (citing ''[[Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife]]'', 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992)). |
| | | | |
| | Often it is an association that asserts standing, and the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has explained how [[associational standing]] supplements the constitutional requirement of standing: | | Often it is an association that asserts standing, and the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has explained how [[associational standing]] supplements the constitutional requirement of standing: |