| Line 301: |
Line 301: |
| | | | |
| | ::RobS, I was addressing a statement that said "The term was invented to impugn and slander opponents of homosexuality." I don't know whose statement that was. I provided a citation that supports some things that some people have said. But please look clearly at what it does and does not support. | | ::RobS, I was addressing a statement that said "The term was invented to impugn and slander opponents of homosexuality." I don't know whose statement that was. I provided a citation that supports some things that some people have said. But please look clearly at what it does and does not support. |
| − | :::The statement has been made that the term "homophobia" is used as a tool by gay-rights advocates to further their cause. Well, I think Herek can be fairly described as a gay-rights advocate and indeed, here is a gay-rights advocate saying "His term became an important tool for gay and lesbian activists, advocates, and their allies." OK.
| + | ::The statement has been made that the term "homophobia" is used as a tool by gay-rights advocates to further their cause. Well, I think Herek can be fairly described as a gay-rights advocate and indeed, here is a gay-rights advocate saying "His term became an important tool for gay and lesbian activists, advocates, and their allies." OK. |
| − | :::It does ''not'' say that it was '''invented for that purpose.''' Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, but the passage I quote from Herek does '''not''' say that.
| + | ::It does ''not'' say that it was '''invented for that purpose.''' Maybe it was, maybe it wasn't, but the passage I quote from Herek does '''not''' say that. |
| − | :::And it says that it was a tool "'''for''' gay and lesbian activists, advocates, and their allies." It does '''not''' say that was a tool for "impugning and slandering" opponents. Slander, in particular, is a pretty strong word with a reasonably specific meaning.
| + | ::And it says that it was a tool "'''for''' gay and lesbian activists, advocates, and their allies." It does '''not''' say that was a tool for "impugning and slandering" opponents. Slander, in particular, is a pretty strong word with a reasonably specific meaning. |
| − | :::Please be clear about the distinction between these statements. They are not the same.
| + | ::Please be clear about the distinction between these statements. They are ''not the same.'' |
| − | ::::*"It has been a useful propaganda tool which gay-right activists have used to advance their cause."
| + | :::*"It has been a useful propaganda tool which gay-right activists have used to advance their cause." |
| − | ::::*"It has been widely used by gay-rights activists to impugn their opponents."
| + | :::*"It has been widely used by gay-rights activists to impugn their opponents." |
| − | ::::*"It was invented to impugn opponents of homosexuality."
| + | :::*"It was invented to impugn opponents of homosexuality." |
| − | ::::*"It was invented to impugn and slander opponents of homosexuality."
| + | :::*"It was invented to impugn and slander opponents of homosexuality." |
| − | :::::[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
| + | ::::[[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | ==Proposed compromise== | | ==Proposed compromise== |