25
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Its an attempt at making fun of this little operation. What a joke that an encyclopedia should represent a conservative viewpoint. --[[User:Truth is bipartisan|Truth is bipartisan]] 17:56, 18 March 2007 (EDT)+ − Who left this message? Is this in regards to my edit of "Truth is bipartisan"? This entry was (slated for removal before I changed it) removed probably because it was combative. I only changed it because the wording of the title was rediculous. 1. There is no truth in politics. 2. It was insulting to the concept of truth, which is very complicated (if you study epistomology) "it is not the absence of lies". 3. It was not an effective insult to anyone because truth really can't be bipartissan, truth is above all that rubish. People don't change their minds about things simply because you say something and then insult them. If you didn't want to change opinions then you were simply venting your frustration (this is not productive). Also if the site is a joke it doesn't need you to point that out. People who are educated or have a critical mind would see that for themselves and people who don't are still smart enough to feel attacked. Lastly and probably most importantly almost all "Knowledge" is biased in some, if not several ways (although one hopes in many cases this is unintentional).
Removing all content from page