Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,563
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + +
no edit summary
I'm just thinking out loud here. Must there be a distinct lack of a legal process for removing a dictator for it to be a dictatorship? What if, say, Hugo Chavez was ousted from office because he lost an election, and then simply said "no, I won't go". The legal process exists, but so long as the executive branch listens to him (i.e. so long as he still has control of coercive force), he's still a dictator, right? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:17, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
I'm just thinking out loud here. Must there be a distinct lack of a legal process for removing a dictator for it to be a dictatorship? What if, say, Hugo Chavez was ousted from office because he lost an election, and then simply said "no, I won't go". The legal process exists, but so long as the executive branch listens to him (i.e. so long as he still has control of coercive force), he's still a dictator, right? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 10:17, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
==Biblical reference==
I'm going to remove these scriptural quotes. They are total nonsense. Nowhere does the term "dictator" appear in ''Strong's Exhaustive Concordance''.
Ed Poor gave an infinite block to the troll who inserted this subversive nonsense in CP five years ago, as if CP supports dictatorship and teaches it's God condones it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]</sup> 00:47, 3 December 2018 (EST)