Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + + + +
Let's distinguish between speculation and science
It's interesting to note that Reference 4 does not in any way support the assertion that it is supposed to be verifying - that there was a land bridge between Australia and Europe. [[User:Chrysogonus|Chrysogonus]] 05:52, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
It's interesting to note that Reference 4 does not in any way support the assertion that it is supposed to be verifying - that there was a land bridge between Australia and Europe. [[User:Chrysogonus|Chrysogonus]] 05:52, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:Thanks for pointing that out. I've provided a different reference. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:45, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:Thanks for pointing that out. I've provided a different reference. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:45, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
==Evolution of the wombat==
If anyone has proof that the wombat evolved, please present it. Merely saying that some scientists "asserts" or "speculates" something tells our readers nothing.
I've heard speculation that the earth is hollow and we're all walking around on the inner surface of a sphere, with gravity pulling us outward. But without a theoretical explanation (which is [[falsifiable]]), I would dismiss such a notion as [[pseudoscience]].