nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + +
Mitochondrial and fossil evidence
::Perhaps you'd like to explain why you feel the creationist section should be deleted. That is the usual "wiki" thing to do: explain one's intent or rationale, rather than engaging in an [[edit war]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:22, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
::Perhaps you'd like to explain why you feel the creationist section should be deleted. That is the usual "wiki" thing to do: explain one's intent or rationale, rather than engaging in an [[edit war]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:22, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== Mitochondrial and fossil evidence ==
JoshuaZ has inserted the line, "''This hypothesis is supported by [[mitochrondria|mitochondrial]] genetic evidence as well as fossil evidence''". Not having access to his source, could he or someone please explain how the evidence support this? Thanks in anticipation. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:25, 7 May 2007 (EDT)