Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 226:
Line 226: + + + + + + + + + +
evidence for unguided evolution
ok....--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 11:18, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
ok....--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 11:18, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
==[[Origins debate]]==
Joshua, at [[talk:wombat]] you wrote:
:''Ed, so under that logic why did you leave in the creationist section? Heck, we should remove any mention of origins related issues from all articles. I'm not going to do that since I appreciate the point of a WP:POINT sort of guideline even if we dont have one here.''
Rather than conducting a proxy battle at each cute furry animal's article, why not address the issue head on? Any evidence for [[unguided evolution]] would be welcome at this encyclopedia, as far as I'm concerned.
Just don't stick it in the flagship article, [[Theory of evolution]]. Just as there are certain "owned" articles at Wikipedia (like ID) which require 'consensus' to be formed '''before''' edits are made, the same thing prevails here, like it or not (and I don't). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:56, 7 May 2007 (EDT)