Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
359 bytes added ,  19:44, December 11, 2018
m
I have added a note about PM Margaret Thatcher and her role in creating the IPCC
Line 193: Line 193:     
[[Christopher Monckton]] wrote an article entitled "Climate sensitivity reconsidered" which states that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change studies are flawed.<ref>Monckton, Christopher (July 2008). [http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm "Climate sensitivity reconsidered"].  ''Physics & Society'' newsletter.  Retrieved from American Physical Society/Forum on Physics and Society website on September 29, 2014.</ref>
 
[[Christopher Monckton]] wrote an article entitled "Climate sensitivity reconsidered" which states that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change studies are flawed.<ref>Monckton, Christopher (July 2008). [http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm "Climate sensitivity reconsidered"].  ''Physics & Society'' newsletter.  Retrieved from American Physical Society/Forum on Physics and Society website on September 29, 2014.</ref>
 +
 +
Christopher Monkton was the scientific advisor to PM Margaret Thatcher. Margaret Thatcher was an advocate of the "precautionary principle" and was instrumental in the creation of the IPCC [https://insidestory.org.au/margaret-thatchers-message-to-the-future/ "Margaret Thatcher’s message to the future"] Retrieved from Inside Story on OCTOBER 10 2018</ref>
    
:The present analysis suggests the models failure to predict other climatic phenomena arises from defects in its evaluation of radioactive forcing, no-feedbacks climate sensitivity parameter and feedback multiplier. In conclusion, that there may be no "Climate Crisis" and for governments to reduce emissions may be pointless or even harmful.
 
:The present analysis suggests the models failure to predict other climatic phenomena arises from defects in its evaluation of radioactive forcing, no-feedbacks climate sensitivity parameter and feedback multiplier. In conclusion, that there may be no "Climate Crisis" and for governments to reduce emissions may be pointless or even harmful.

Navigation menu