Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 21: Line 21:     
::::While that might be true, one dont still see them referring science as "secular science" and no matter what their personal beliefs are, their research is based on natural phenomens and supernatural is left outside off it. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 20:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::::While that might be true, one dont still see them referring science as "secular science" and no matter what their personal beliefs are, their research is based on natural phenomens and supernatural is left outside off it. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 20:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I think that section should be added back in as it's very relevant.  And to counter Conservative's claim that 55% of scientists are theists: that doesn't matter, any good scientist/human can separate their beliefs from their work to come to a valid independent conclusion.  When one starts injecting personal opinions and creeds into their research the outcome may not be correct. [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 13:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
852

edits

Navigation menu