Changes

Despite a $50 million fundraising advantage from [[Hollywood]], [[Wall Street]], and [[globalism|global]] [[elitism|elites]], the Democratic party leadership's advocacy of mob [[violence]] to advance [[socialism]] became a key issue.<ref>https://youtu.be/hlMIyae9-ZU</ref> The [[Kavanaugh smear]], Democrat disruptions of the orderly working of [[Congress]], and the Democrats' denial of [[due process]] rights energized the Republican base.<ref>https://youtu.be/iW4YwZtRAUY</ref>

Despite a $50 million fundraising advantage from [[Hollywood]], [[Wall Street]], and [[globalism|global]] [[elitism|elites]], the Democratic party leadership's advocacy of mob [[violence]] to advance [[socialism]] became a key issue.<ref>https://youtu.be/hlMIyae9-ZU</ref> The [[Kavanaugh smear]], Democrat disruptions of the orderly working of [[Congress]], and the Democrats' denial of [[due process]] rights energized the Republican base.<ref>https://youtu.be/iW4YwZtRAUY</ref>

Democrat [[Beto O'Rourke]] of [[Texas]], having wasted a record $70 million, is now considered a qualified leading contender by Democrats and the liberal media for 2020 Presidential nomination.

Democrat [[Beto O'Rourke]] of [[Texas]] is now considered a qualified leading contender by Democrats and the liberal media for 2020 Presidential nomination.

===Supreme Court===

===Supreme Court===

:{{See also|Kavanaugh smear|MeToo movement}}

:{{See also|Kavanaugh smear|MeToo movement}}

[[File:Sarsour hearing-500x281.jpg|right|300px|thumb|[[Linda Sarsour]] removed from the hearing room. Sarsour is a notorious [[anti-Semite]] and spokesperson for leftist causes.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/opinion/womens-march-progressives-hate.html</ref>]]

[[File:Sarsour hearing-500x281.jpg|right|300px|thumb|[[Linda Sarsour]] removed from the hearing room. Sarsour is a notorious [[anti-Semite]] and spokesperson for leftist causes.<ref>https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/opinion/womens-march-progressives-hate.html</ref>]]

''[[The New Yorker]]'' publicized in March 2012 that [[Brett Kavanaugh]] was the most likely next nominee if a Republican were to win the election.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/26/holding-court</ref>  Within a few months, [[Christine Blasey Ford]] for the first time allegedly told her therapist that she had been fondled at a drinking party and felt threatened. The therapist notes, however, do not name Kavanaugh.

''[[The New Yorker]]'' publicized in March 2012 that [[Brett Kavanaugh]] was the most likely next nominee if a Republican were to win the election.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/26/holding-court</ref>  Within a few months, [[Christine Blasey Ford]] for the first time allegedly told her therapist that she had been fondled at a drinking party and felt threatened. The therapist's notes, however, do not name Kavanaugh.

In the Spring of 2018, [[President Donald Trump]] nominated Judge Kavanaugh to the [[Supreme Court]]. Ricki Seidman, who orchestrated the 1991 [[Clarence Thomas]] smear, mapped out the plan to defame Kavanaugh in July 2018: {{quotebox|"Over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee."<ref>[https://youtu.be/zRttpJxj59A Begins at 3:20.]</ref>}} Like the attack on Justice Thomas, outrageous last minute personal smears were intended to erroneously waste the time of Congress.

In the Spring of 2018, [[President Donald Trump]] nominated Judge Kavanaugh to the [[Supreme Court]]. Ricki Seidman, who orchestrated the 1991 [[Clarence Thomas]] smear, mapped out the plan to defame Kavanaugh in July 2018: {{quotebox|"Over the coming days and weeks there will be a strategy that will emerge, and I think it’s possible that that strategy might ultimately defeat the nominee."<ref>[https://youtu.be/zRttpJxj59A Begins at 3:20.]</ref>}} Like the attack on Justice Thomas, outrageous last minute personal smears were intended to erroneously waste the time of Congress.

''[[The Washington Post]]'' first published Blasey Ford's allegations in a letter under an anonymous op-ed byline. The op-ed named Kavanaugh as one of the boys at the drinking party in high school.  Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]] did not ask the FBI to investigate when she received the letter in July 2018, held it for two months during hearings, then passed the anonymous slanders along to ''WaPo'' when the regular hearings ended.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/dianne-feinstein-falsely-claims-gop-blocking-fbi-probe-of-kavanaugh-allegation/</ref><ref>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/msn/how-feinstein-is-conspiring-to-destroy-kavanaugh/ar-AAAuxh9</ref> In the interim Blasey Ford was directed by unknown operatives to take a polygraph test in August 2018. The allegations were withheld by Feinstein and the Democrats from the [[FBI]] during the FBI's pre-hearing investigation and vetting process.<ref>https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/18/lindsey-graham-ford-no-intention-coming-forward-whyd-take-polygraph-early-august/</ref>  

''[[The Washington Post]]'' first published Blasey Ford's allegations in a letter under an anonymous op-ed byline. The op-ed named Kavanaugh as one of the boys at the drinking party in high school.  Sen. [[Dianne Feinstein]] did not ask the FBI to investigate when she received the letter in July 2018, held it for two months during hearings, then passed the anonymous slanders along to ''WaPo'' when the regular hearings ended.<ref>https://www.nationalreview.com/news/dianne-feinstein-falsely-claims-gop-blocking-fbi-probe-of-kavanaugh-allegation/</ref><ref>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/msn/how-feinstein-is-conspiring-to-destroy-kavanaugh/ar-AAAuxh9</ref> In the interim, Blasey Ford was directed by unknown operatives to take a polygraph test in August 2018. The allegations were withheld by Feinstein and the Democrats from the [[FBI]] during the FBI's pre-hearing investigation and vetting process.<ref>https://hotair.com/archives/2018/09/18/lindsey-graham-ford-no-intention-coming-forward-whyd-take-polygraph-early-august/</ref>  

Then, during the period in which the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed the vote 10 days to accommodate Blasey Ford's testimony, the ''[[New Yorker]]'' published an allegation Kavanaugh exposed himself at a drinking party at [[Yale]] to a female classmate.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez</ref> The ''New Yorker'' wrote: {{quotebox|"The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident...''The New Yorker'' has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."}} The accuser did give the ''New Yorker'' six names to support her claim, six witnesses Deborah Ramirez stated could substantiate her accusation.  And when the ''New Yorker'' interviewed them, '''''all six''''' said it never happened, and although 100% of the evidence discovered by the ''New Yorker'' refuted the claim, yet the ''New Yorker'' still published the article.

Then, during the period in which the Senate Judiciary Committee delayed the vote 10 days to accommodate Blasey Ford's testimony, the ''[[New Yorker]]'' published an allegation that Kavanaugh exposed himself at a drinking party at [[Yale]] to a female classmate.<ref>https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez</ref> The ''New Yorker'' wrote: {{quotebox|"The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident...''The New Yorker'' has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party."}} The accuser did give the ''New Yorker'' six names to support her claim- six witnesses Deborah Ramirez stated could substantiate her accusation.  And when the ''New Yorker'' interviewed them, '''''all six''''' said it never happened, and although 100% of the evidence discovered by the ''New Yorker'' refuted the claim, the ''New Yorker'' still published the article.

In the end Judge Kavanaugh was confirmed, and the Democrats roundly condemned for their sickening conduct.

In the end, Judge Kavanaugh was confirmed, and the Democrats were roundly condemned for their sickening conduct.

===Abolishing ICE===

===Abolishing ICE===