Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,802 bytes added ,  05:57, December 25, 2018
Nice picture!
Line 794: Line 794:     
::::And incidentally, the reason you don't get given sysop powers here is because if that happened, you'd most certainly abuse them by misusing them to force a liberal POV on articles and blocking those you don't agree with here (which would mean just about every conservative-leaning editor here), which would result in even more fights here than you already cause and would only be disruptive to the site - and that's not needed here. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:46, 1 October 2018 (EDT)
 
::::And incidentally, the reason you don't get given sysop powers here is because if that happened, you'd most certainly abuse them by misusing them to force a liberal POV on articles and blocking those you don't agree with here (which would mean just about every conservative-leaning editor here), which would result in even more fights here than you already cause and would only be disruptive to the site - and that's not needed here. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:46, 1 October 2018 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::Your presumption to know the reason I don't have assistant ("sysop") authority is incorrect.  I do not want block powers, and I have said so many times over the last 10-1/2 years.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:57, 25 December 2018 (EST)
    
== Resurrection - The new and improved version of the phantom essay ==
 
== Resurrection - The new and improved version of the phantom essay ==
Line 800: Line 802:     
I hope you find that the added content further clarifies matters.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:24, 24 December 2018 (EST)
 
I hope you find that the added content further clarifies matters.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:24, 24 December 2018 (EST)
 +
 +
:Well, I'm glad you have apparently decided that this "essay" should become a permanent part of your work.  I was worried for a while that you considered it to be some silly "throwaway" thing.  It's really one of your most charming things, mostly because of the really nice picture of the two kids.  Though it's not clear to me that they are cheering over the victory of Christianity.  They might be exulting over having won something in a computer game they are playing.  Or maybe cheering over having posted something stupid, perhaps involving cats, or maybe gerbils, on social media.  Or maybe they are cheering about having successfully vandalized Conservapedia.  :-)  You never know.
 +
 +
:But its not possible that your added content "clarifies matters".  I'd have to read the article.  You see, I don't read your articles.  I just look at the pictures.  And this was a nice picture.
 +
 +
:Now, I have a bone to pick with you over your flippant use of the word "resurrection".  I've never liked the use of that word other than in the context of Jesus.  Here you are talking about having undeleted a file on a wiki.
 +
::And they gave him vinegar to drink mingled with gall: and when he had tasted thereof, he would not drink.
 +
::And they did a "delete page" operation on him, and parted his garments.  And they "changed visibility of 3 revisions" on him.
 +
::But on the third day they "restored his page".
 +
 +
:Not right.
 +
 +
:Be that as it may, have a Merry Christmas.
 +
 +
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:57, 25 December 2018 (EST)
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
3,266

edits

Navigation menu