Changes

:i concur.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]

:i concur.[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]]

::I looked at the cite and changed it accordingly.  If you've read Luttwak, he's hardly "some historian."  Rather, he's a historian and military strategist ''par excelance'', but the previous author's explanation of Luttwak's argument was false.  Luttwak didn't say that Rome was never strong; just that it wasn't strong ENOUGH to take on the barbarians at any point in its history.  Rather, it avoided the issue, but could only run so far.  Other than that, I would not tamper with the citation.  Luttwak is a very well respected historian.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 17:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

::I looked at the cite and changed it accordingly.  If you've read Luttwak, he's hardly "some historian."  Rather, he's a historian and military strategist ''par excelance'', but the previous author's explanation of Luttwak's argument was false.  Luttwak didn't say that Rome was never strong; just that it wasn't strong ENOUGH to take on the barbarians at any point in its history.  Rather, it avoided the issue, but could only run so far.  Other than that, I would not tamper with the citation.  Luttwak is a very well respected historian.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 17:39, 7 May 2007 (EDT)