85
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Line 7:
Line 6: + +
Conservapedia talk:Blocking policy (view source)
Revision as of 22:48, May 7, 2007
, 22:48, May 7, 2007no edit summary
''This is a COPY'' of Terry's comment, in response to the post "Please don't block me!"
''This is a COPY'' of Terry's comment, in response to the post "Please don't block me!"
*One might add that there isn't some codified "right" to belong anywhere on the Internet. Users removed for real or preceived violations are not abused in any manner. Fairness is what matters. If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:22, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
*One might add that there isn't some codified "right" to belong anywhere on the Internet. Users removed for real or preceived violations are not abused in any manner. Fairness is what matters. If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:22, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
:Also, repeated reverts, after a warning either on the Talk page of the article, or the users Talk page, should suffice for blocking grounds. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
:Also, repeated reverts, after a warning either on the Talk page of the article, or the users Talk page, should suffice for blocking grounds. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 23:59, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::''If you are wrong, or there is the strong possibility you are, your actions can always be reversed.'' If you can make your case heard, haing been blocked, and against entrenched and dogmatic oppositiuon. There are too many pharisees on this site.