287
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 121:
Line 121: +
→Important elements to include in the Article: Copernicus and Galileo needed
: Point 3 contradicts those points. If geocentrism is somehow more correct, then it is not just a philosophical choice. If Katz says that new cosmological evidence shows that the frame is not a matter of choice, then that would be worth considering. He does not.
: Point 3 contradicts those points. If geocentrism is somehow more correct, then it is not just a philosophical choice. If Katz says that new cosmological evidence shows that the frame is not a matter of choice, then that would be worth considering. He does not.
: As for Point 5, there is another article on [[Galileo]] addressing the matter, and I suggest checking that out. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]]
: As for Point 5, there is another article on [[Galileo]] addressing the matter, and I suggest checking that out. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]]
:: There are now no links to Galileo. Should we add "[[Copernicus]] and [[Galileo]] were the main proponents of the Heliocentric view." or somethink short like that containing links to these important men in history of this theory. --[[User:Aulis Eskola|Aulis Eskola]] 18:50, 7 May 2007 (EDT)