367
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17:
Line 17: + +
no edit summary
:I fixed it further. The previous guy got the general idea of Luttwak right, but not fully. I recommend the book to anyone interested, though. Fascinating stuff.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 17:41, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:I fixed it further. The previous guy got the general idea of Luttwak right, but not fully. I recommend the book to anyone interested, though. Fascinating stuff.-'''Speak[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:SpeakerOfTheDead er]''' 17:41, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
::It may be a fascinating book and I'm not questioning that, but I'm not sure the view deserves any level of prominence when compared to the mainstream tried and true thought. We're giving reading room to a view that has never caught on and presenting it in a way that readers will not be able to tell the difference. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 20:06, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
::It may be a fascinating book and I'm not questioning that, but I'm not sure the view deserves any level of prominence when compared to the mainstream tried and true thought. We're giving reading room to a view that has never caught on and presenting it in a way that readers will not be able to tell the difference. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 20:06, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
I nominate "Roman Engineering" to be spun off into its own article, and removed from here as clutter.--[[User:JoyousOne|JoyousOne]] 20:19, 7 May 2007 (EDT)