Changes

# Robert McHenry, former Editor-in-Chief for the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', wrote about Wikipedia's bias and included this observation:<ref>http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-edemocracy/wikipedia_bias_3621.jsp</ref>

# Robert McHenry, former Editor-in-Chief for the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', wrote about Wikipedia's bias and included this observation:<ref>http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-edemocracy/wikipedia_bias_3621.jsp</ref>

#:One simple fact that must be accepted as the basis for any intellectual work is that truth – whatever definition of that word you may subscribe to – is not democratically determined.

#:One simple fact that must be accepted as the basis for any intellectual work is that truth – whatever definition of that word you may subscribe to – is not democratically determined.

# Note that unlike Wikipedia, on Conservapedia entries are determined democratically, and then combed through by unbiased, conservative editors to ensure accuracy.

Note that unlike Wikipedia, on Conservapedia entries are determined democratically, and then combed through by unbiased, conservative editors to ensure accuracy.

# Bob Schmidt observed on the ''Illinois Review'':<ref>http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2007/01/conservapedia_w.html</ref>

# Bob Schmidt observed on the ''Illinois Review'':<ref>http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2007/01/conservapedia_w.html</ref>

#:I just spent some time in Wikipedia checking if my recollections of its bias are correct. The bias is much worse than I had remembered.

#:I just spent some time in Wikipedia checking if my recollections of its bias are correct. The bias is much worse than I had remembered.