| Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| | The decision to allow attendance of fact witnesses during Clinton’s interview came from the DOJ, although Page said she wasn’t certain who had made the decision. She noted that the FBI protested the move but were overridden, so the decision must have come from a senior level within the DOJ. | | The decision to allow attendance of fact witnesses during Clinton’s interview came from the DOJ, although Page said she wasn’t certain who had made the decision. She noted that the FBI protested the move but were overridden, so the decision must have come from a senior level within the DOJ. |
| | | | |
| | + | ===Mills and Samuelson laptops=== |
| | + | Lisa Page testified: |
| | + | “There was a great deal of discussion between the FBI and the department with respect to whether to proceed, obtain the server which housed the bulk of Secretary Clinton’s emails, pursuant to consent or pursuant to a subpoena or other compulsory process.” |
| | + | |
| | + | “There were, I think, months of disagreement with respect to obtaining the Mills and Samuelson laptops. So Heather Mills and—Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were both lawyers who engaged in the sorting. Once it had been identified that Secretary Clinton had these emails—I’m guessing it’s pursuant to the [[FOIA]] request, but I don’t really know—she—well, our understanding is that she asked her two lawyers to take the bulk of the 60,000 emails and to sort out those which were work-related from those which were personal and to produce the work-related ones to the State Department. |
| | + | |
| | + | “They did so. That 30,000 is sort of the bulk of the emails that we relied on in order to do the investigative technique, although we found other emails a jillion other places. We, the FBI, felt very strongly that we had to acquire and attempt to review the content of the Mills and Samuelson laptops because, to the extent the other 30,000 existed anywhere, that is the best place that they may have existed.” |
| | + | |
| | + | “And notwithstanding the fact that they had been deleted, you know, we wanted at least to take a shot at using, you know, forensic recovery tools in order to try to ensure that, in fact, the sorting that occurred between—or by Mills and Samuelson was done correctly.” |
| | + | |
| | + | According to Page, the ongoing dispute with the DOJ ran from “February/March-ish of 2016” to June of 2016. Page also noted one other critical factor in the investigation: “the FBI cannot execute a search warrant without approval from the Justice Department.” |
| | + | |
| | + | Notably, Page, an experienced lawyer, thought the legal case could be made that the Mills and Samuelson laptops should be made available for forensic examination. As she noted, the frustration within the FBI came, in part, from the DOJ’s “unwillingness to explain their reasoning.” |
| | + | |
| | + | Page noted that the issue regarding the laptops rose to “the head of the OEO, the Office of Enforcement Operations, which is the unit at the Justice Department that would have to approve a warrant on a lawyer—because, of course, these were all lawyer laptops. It rose to that individual, it rose to George Toscas, over the course of this three months or so.” |
| | + | |
| | + | “I think that even the Director [Comey] may have had a conversation with [[Sally Yates]], the DAG [Deputy Attorney General], about it.” |
| | + | |
| | + | Page was also critical of the State Department’s handling of the affair, noting, “rather than the State Department itself conducting that analysis of whether or not there was—or whether these emails were work-related or not, deferred to Secretary Clinton to do that.” |
| | + | |
| | + | ===Lynch's profile in courage=== |
| | Attorney General [[Loretta Lynch]] announced that she would accept whatever recommendation FBI Director [[James Comey]] made about charging Clinton. Lisa Page and FBI Deputy Assistant Director (DAD) for Counterintelligence [[Peter Strzok]] exchanged messages saying that Lynch knew in advance of the FBI's decision not to recommend prosecuting Hillary Clinton. | | Attorney General [[Loretta Lynch]] announced that she would accept whatever recommendation FBI Director [[James Comey]] made about charging Clinton. Lisa Page and FBI Deputy Assistant Director (DAD) for Counterintelligence [[Peter Strzok]] exchanged messages saying that Lynch knew in advance of the FBI's decision not to recommend prosecuting Hillary Clinton. |
| | | | |