164
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 66:
Line 66: + +
→Continental boundaries: responded to and thanked (in case it isn't obvious) Philip for keeping me in line
:Not sure I agree with ''all'' of that, but what I really want to comment on is that (a) the article ''and not the talk page'' is part of the encyclopedia, so the article should not refer to the encyclopedia, even in a footnote, and therefore (b) this information should be either incorporated into the article proper or in a separate article linked from this one. I'm therefore going to remove the reference to this talk page from the article's footnote. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:18, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:Not sure I agree with ''all'' of that, but what I really want to comment on is that (a) the article ''and not the talk page'' is part of the encyclopedia, so the article should not refer to the encyclopedia, even in a footnote, and therefore (b) this information should be either incorporated into the article proper or in a separate article linked from this one. I'm therefore going to remove the reference to this talk page from the article's footnote. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:18, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
:: Ah, you rules people! I'm happy to plod along and have you pick up after me cause I'm sure that I don't have time to read, let alone, remember all these rules. Sure, there's only 10 but I have enough trouble coping with the big ten! I'm sure once continental drift theory gets in the explanations of definitions there would be a few raised eyebrows! ;-) Keep up the good work. --[[User:Bilby|Bilby]] 23:53, 7 May 2007 (EDT)