Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,376
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: − +
→Lawyer conduct: Spelling, grammar, and general cleanup, typos fixed: Association’s → Association's
Her lawyers also claimed to have the results of a polygraph examination in the form of audio, video and charts attesting to the veracity of her allegations which they refused to share with the Committee. Chairman [[Chuck Grassley]] demanded material evidence relevant to allegations the attorneys claimed to have had against [[Judge Brett Kavanaugh]].<ref>https://www.scribd.com/document/389991842/Letter-to-Ford-attorneys#from_embed</ref><ref>http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/02/grassley-ford-boyfriend-polygraph/</ref>
Her lawyers also claimed to have the results of a polygraph examination in the form of audio, video and charts attesting to the veracity of her allegations which they refused to share with the Committee. Chairman [[Chuck Grassley]] demanded material evidence relevant to allegations the attorneys claimed to have had against [[Judge Brett Kavanaugh]].<ref>https://www.scribd.com/document/389991842/Letter-to-Ford-attorneys#from_embed</ref><ref>http://dailycaller.com/2018/10/02/grassley-ford-boyfriend-polygraph/</ref>
The Judiciary Committee issued a statement suggesting that Blasey Ford's legal team may have violated the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct by apparently withholding key information from their client.<ref>https://www.dailywire.com/news/36684/senate-judiciary-committee-statement-suggests-james-barrett</ref> Blasey Ford's attorneys may face sanctions by the DC Bar Association.<ref>http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/theres-good-case-sanctioning-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>
The Judiciary Committee issued a statement suggesting that Blasey Ford's legal team may have violated the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct by apparently withholding key information from their client.<ref>https://www.dailywire.com/news/36684/senate-judiciary-committee-statement-suggests-james-barrett</ref> Blasey Ford's attorneys may face sanctions by the DC Bar Association.<ref>http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/theres-good-case-sanctioning-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>
On October 30, 2018 Judicial Watch filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of [[Debra S. Katz]], Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Blasey Ford before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the Kavanaugh nomination hearings.<ref>https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-bar-complaint-against-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>
On October 30, 2018 Judicial Watch filed a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals of [[Debra S. Katz]], Lisa J. Banks, and Michael R. Bromwich for violating the rules of professional responsibility in their representation of Dr. Blasey Ford before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the Kavanaugh nomination hearings.<ref>https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-bar-complaint-against-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/</ref>