Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,641
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 73:
Line 73: − +
→Huey Newton
===Huey Newton===
===Huey Newton===
:{{See also|Black Panthers}}
:{{See also|Black Panthers}}
[[Huey Newton]] was a co-founded the [[Black Panther Party]]. Congresswoman [[Barbara Lee]] was a confidential aide to Newton.<ref>[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=1189 The Clinton Crisis: A Question of Loyalties], David Horowitz, ''FrontPageMagazine.com'', June 6, 1999.</ref> Jones and Newton had the same lawyer, Charles Garry.
[[Huey Newton]] was a co-founder of the [[Black Panther Party]]. Congresswoman [[Barbara Lee]] was a confidential aide to Newton.<ref>[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=1189 The Clinton Crisis: A Question of Loyalties], David Horowitz, ''FrontPageMagazine.com'', June 6, 1999.</ref> Jones and Newton had the same lawyer, Charles Garry.
In 1973 Huey Newton published a book called ''Revolutionary Suicide''. It was a tome on the latest hip [[cultural Marxist]] [[liberal claptrap|claptrap]]. {{quotebox|“The concept of revolutionary suicide is not defeatist or fatalistic. On the contrary, it conveys an awareness of reality in combination with the possibility of hope—reality because the revolutionary must always be prepared to face death, and hope because it symbolizes a resolute determination to bring about change.”}} In Jones reading, Jones failed to distinguish between “revolutionary suicide” and “reactionary suicide”—surrender in response to frustrating conditions—the concept appears so ill-thought through as to make misunderstandings probable.
In 1973 Huey Newton published a book called ''Revolutionary Suicide''. It was a tome on the latest hip [[cultural Marxist]] [[liberal claptrap|claptrap]]. {{quotebox|“The concept of revolutionary suicide is not defeatist or fatalistic. On the contrary, it conveys an awareness of reality in combination with the possibility of hope—reality because the revolutionary must always be prepared to face death, and hope because it symbolizes a resolute determination to bring about change.”}} In Jones reading, Jones failed to distinguish between “revolutionary suicide” and “reactionary suicide”—surrender in response to frustrating conditions—the concept appears so ill-thought through as to make misunderstandings probable.