152
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 125:
Line 125: + + +
→"He was not really a deist as liberals claim."
::Why so gloomy? With the exception of ToE, I have been able to get any idea into any article I choose. Work with me, okay? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:58, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
::Why so gloomy? With the exception of ToE, I have been able to get any idea into any article I choose. Work with me, okay? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 10:58, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
:Well Ed, if you'll check the article right now, you'll see "why so gloomy." ASchlafly has decided only today that the objective, impartial statement of fact that was up there for the better part of three weeks was "liberally biased." Which is actually funny, because it would mean that your statement was coming from said "liberal bias" and I think both of know that isn't the case. AS won't allow anything in an artcle that does not conform to the narrative he wishes to convey. Please realize that. This isnt a community-based encyclopedia, its not an exchange of ideas to better understand and explore them, and above all else, its not a place where the king tolerates dissent. This is Aschlafly's soapbox to say whatever he wants the truth to be. If he wants Ben Franklin to be a devout christian, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary (such as saying he had doubts as to the divinity of Jesus) then gol-derning con-sarning dag-blammit, Ben Franklin is going to be a devout christian whether he was or not.
:--[[User:RexMundane|Rex Mundane]] 10:47, 8 May 2007 (EDT)